TRADITIONAL Barcode Verification- Since the introduction of bar codes, there have been published standards on printing them. Each bar code type, such as UPC or the Interleaved 2 of 5 "case code" specifies a tolerance on the printed widths of bars and spaces, and contrast between bars and spaces. Early verifiers were developed to measure these characteristics and pass or fail bar codes accordingly. This so-called "traditional" barcode verification was a natural extension of the printed bar code specifications.
The difficulty with traditional barcode verification is that the actual scanning experience by the end user did not always correlate to verifier results. Many bar codes that failed barcode verification were actually very easily scanned by normal scanners at the retail store. On the other hand, some bar codes that passed traditional barcode verification could not be scanned. The problem stems from the fact that this barcode verification method was far removed from the way real scanners operate.
The traditional barcode verification method is based on comparing the printed bar widths to the specified bar width within the published tolerance. As scanning systems improved they could read bar codes that were more inaccurate than the published specification allowed. Following the advice of the verifier either required keeping tighter than necessary control over the printing, or throwing away usable product.
Another limitation of traditional barcode verification is that it does not address defects within the printed code, such as voids in bars. To address the issue of defects, ambiguous statements such as "without any spots and voids" were often specified along with the traditional measurement criteria. This subjective means for identification of defects is impossible to quantify and therefore the acceptability of the bar codes cannot be validated.
ANSI Barcode Verification- In recent years new standards and guidelines have been established by ANSI (American National Standards Institute) and the UCC (Uniform Code Council). These new standards measure bar code print quality according to the way actual scanners work. ANSI barcode verification is now relied upon by suppliers and customers of packaging as a basis for ensuring compliance because it addresses virtually all the aspects of print quality that affect scanning.
Barcode verification to the ANSI standard provides printers and converters the benefits of the improved performance to which scanning systems have evolved. Using ANSI grading you do not have to print to tougher standards than are actually required. At the same time, end users are provided protection from getting printing defects in their material that traditional verification could miss.
ANSI's "Bar Code Print Quality Guideline", X3.182 published in 1990, established a procedure for measuring bar code quality. The ANSI guideline provides a standard measurement methodology and defines eight categories of print quality to be measured. The output of the ANSI method is a grade for any bar code on a scale of 0 to 4 or expressed as a letter grade (A,B,C,D, or F) based on the measurements in each category. A grade of "C" or better should scan on virtually any properly maintained scanner on the first pass. Since better quality labels will scan more easily and allow more margin of error, some package purchasers even specify grade "B" or better codes.
The ANSI specification was adopted by the UCC and applied to the most common bar code used in retail distribution, the UPC. The resulting specification filled in some details particular to UPC and also added a ninth criteria, checking the quiet zones.
The benefit of the new standards is that they are closely related to the way scanners work so they can predict scannability of a bar code consistently. Because virtually all of the aspects of print quality that affect scanning are measured, ANSI barcode verification has become the basis for communication between producers and users of printed bar coded products. With these new meaningful standards available, purchasers of packaging are asking for a specific level of bar code quality from their suppliers. Converters are expected to be able to comply.
Other resources:
Center for Automatic Identification, Automatic Identification and Data Capture Technical Institute
Association for Automatic Identification and Mobility
